rotban

Tuesday, August 09, 2016

Cinemalaya 2016: Tuos

Tuesday was a rainy day, perfect weather for watching movies.  Today we'll be talking about Derick Cabrido's Tuos.

The movie takes place somewhere in the mountains of Panay island. Nora Aunor is Pina-ilog, who serves as a 'binukot'. It's a position akin to a princess among the tribe of the Panay Bukidnon. As the fairest maiden in the village, she lives in seclusion, with little to no contact, physical or otherwise, with most of the other people in the village. She is skilled in the arts of embroidery and the oral tradition of the Panay Bukidnon, the Sugidanon. People like her fetch a hefty dowry. She is rearing her young granddaughter (Barbie Forteza) to be the next binukot. But the child is rebellious and fiercely independent; this makes Pina-ilog examine the circumstances of her own life and tradition.

Interspersed with the narrative are animated excerpts from one of the epics of the Sugidanon, the tale of Tikum Kadlum, whose story draws parallels to the main story and its themes. Its titular character is an enchanted hunting dog with the ability to see paranormal things. Tikum Kadlum appears in both narratives, serving as a spiritual guide for the characters involved; he becomes the very presence of the spirits in the real world. Metaphor, reality and the spiritual mix to create an interesting sort of magical realism. 

The clash of old and new traditions is reflected in with our two main characters. Whereas Nora Aunor's performance is mostly silent and restrained, excellent as always, Barbie Forteza matches her almost every step of the way with an equally adroit performance, contrasting Nora's silence and restraint with impatience, naivete and intense emotion. I believe she's one of the most talented actresses in her generation.

The movie's theme encapsulates a paradigm shift - where characters realize that the old ways may not always be the best ones. Its spirit of independence epitomizes the spirit of what this festival should be, which is made even more evident when the movie meta-analyzes itself and the current filmmaking industry in its final frames. It is a challenge, an exhortation, a silent prayer - to break free from the established mold of filmmaking and open one's self to the endless possibilities of the art form. And it is a challenge to us, the audience, as well, to seek the same kind of experiences in watching them.

Monday, August 08, 2016

Cinemalaya 2016: Ang Bagong Pamilya ni Ponching, Hiblang Abo, Mercury is Mine, Lando at Bugoy, Shorts B

Though it wears the clothes of a warm and fuzzy lighthearted comedy, Ang Bagong Pamilya ni Ponching has something to say regarding topics such as class differences and cultural norms.

Thanks to a perfectly (and coincidentally) timed scam text, petty criminal Ponching (Janus Del Prado) is mistaken for the long lost son of Santiago, the dying scion of the Dela Vera family. Ponching's set to inherit a lot of money and swindle the family, but he's a nice guy at heart and he starts having second thoughts. Ponching then goes about and brings the family together in unexpected ways, while wrestling with the morality of his actions.

While mostly fluff, the movie has a few legit heartwarming moments, especially the scenes involving the matriarch of the family, Lola Ludivina. Scenes for some of the other characters aren't as fleshed out and involve just a few conversations. Most importantly, we barely get anything on the second eldest child of the clan, Arianna, and her tendency to try to fix things and control her siblings and mother isn't fully developed.

Rich and poor are clearly unequal in this film - while the poor struggle to survive and often do illegal stuff to move forward in the world, the rich have problems of another kind - problems where issues with money drive them apart, where family name and status come first before love, where a lack of understanding leads to disagreements. Ponching provides a novel point of view for the Dela Veras and helps them see life in different ways. Ponching, on the other hand, goes through a period of self examination throughout the film as well, creating a quirky relationship where both parties help each other.

Ponching's central structure is not a new concept - films where a new addition to a family changes it (more or less) for the better span from Frank Capra in You Can't Take it With You to the unbridled madness of Takashi Miike's Visitor Q. Ponching wraps it in a fun, well-acted package that makes it the lightest of this year's Cinemalaya films.

Hiblang Abo is one of Rene Villanueva's most iconic plays. Back in the early 2000's or late nineties, I managed to see this play as part of a field trip. Its final image, that of an old man, broken and alone, seared itself into my memory. Because of that experience I find it hard to not compare this new movie adaptation, directed by Ralston Jover, to the play I remember so well.

The play (and the film) take place in a senior citizens' home. Four old men, go through the twilight of their lives lost in the haze of their own pasts, going through the motions of the day. Death is not uncommon here, as these are men who are, for all intents and purposes, waiting to die.

We also see flashbacks detailing these character's pasts, where the younger version of all four characters are ingeniously played by Matt Daclan. The casting is deliberate, as these four men are endpoints of the same process - a life filled with heartbreak, bad decisions, and regret.

While the movie does start with some lighter moments, things get dark really fast. It's a mood that sustains itself for the rest of the film, and we join these broken men, hand in hand, as they descend into their own personal hell, as sometimes death is sweet release compared to the agony of life itself. It's helped by excellent performances by the ensemble cast; Nanding Josef and Lou Veloso stand out. While it may not stick in my mind as prominently as the play did, Hiblang Abo captures the darkness of these four men very well.

It took me a while to process Mercury is Mine, Jason Laxamana's latest film. It's definitely a peculiar story, and while I wasn't really on board with where the movie eventually took me, there were parts of the movie I really enjoyed and at the very least, it caught my attention.

Mercury is Mine pairs Mercury (Bret Jackson,) an American kid with tons of emotional baggage and Carmen (Pokwang), a cook with dreams of stardom. Both have their own issues with their lives: Carmen has tons of insecurities and wants someone to connect to, and Mercury is a lonely kid who shifts from manic rage to gentleness -  he's pretty messed up. They strike this strange relationship that has tones of friendship, parental love, and a current of Oedipal sexual tension.

The first two thirds of the movie develops this relationship as Carmen and Mercury work together and try to understand each other. Their relationship is my favorite thing in the film. It's a unique and complex bond between two strangers that I haven't really seen anywhere else. Of course, the relationship can be interpreted as is; while if we take it on a deeper level it can be seen as a commentary on colonialism, with the naive native dazzled by the charms of a handsome yet deeply flawed foreigner, idealizing him, emulating his skin color, hair color and appearance. (Okay, that's probably a bit too deep.)

This relationship is interesting thanks to the performances of the two leads. Pokwang's performance is funny, charming, even a bit endearing in a way. Bret Jackson has some interesting moments too, but sometimes it's hit or miss.

The last third of the film takes us into territory that's unexpected and a bit absurd. Some of the character decisions during this part kind of baffled me and I was trying to make sense of it all even after the credits were rolling. (At one point I wondered if the scriptwriter wrote himself into a corner and had to do something crazy to get out of it, but who knows.) The ending in particular also threw me into a loop. Perhaps I need a second viewing for this one.

All in all Mercury is Mine had some things I absolutely loved, and some things that completely confused me. I'd like to hear your thoughts on this one.

Communication underscores one of the central themes of Lando and Bugoy - miscommunication leads to misunderstanding, broken family bonds, and in one case, erroneous dates on gravestones.

The two titular characters are father and son. Their family life is more or less nonexistent -  while Lando, the father, slaves away making gravestones, Bugoy, the son, slacks off, drinks booze and smokes cigarettes. The lack of a mother figure and the resentment stemming from said lack of mother definitely doesn't help things at all. Lando then decides to go to school in an effort to encourage his son to quit playing hooky.

The central conflict involves both father and son completely failing to understand each other. It's a communication gap that has existed in the relationships of fathers and sons as long as fathers and sons have existed. They're simply unable to express themselves to each other verbally as fathers and sons are wont to do.

Lando and Bugoy's plot and concepts could probably have worked as a shorter film. The focus on education doesn't stand out as much, even though the true story this movie is based upon is centered on education. There is an emphasis on how hard work and dedication can get one through school, but it plays second fiddle to the central father-son narrative. On the other hand, a particular scene near the end could have been extended a bit more, to show that at last, somehow, something was getting across from father to son.

Overall Lando and Bugoy is just ok.The way the story is structured doesn't completely work, but it has some really nice moments thanks to Allen Dizon and Gold Azeron.

---

WE WANT SHORT SHORTS Cinemalaya 2016 edition Short Shorts Reviews  

Set B

Butas has some gorgeous shots of the mountains of Benguet (finally somewhere where I can say drone shots are needed here.) It manages to portray the hopes and fears of a single mom living a dangerous life for the sake of her young son. I wanted to flesh out the mother's backstory a bit more, but I'm satisfied with what I got. 3.25/5

Ang Hapon ni Nanding is an interesting balance between Milo Tolentino's old and new work. The overall effect is a bit mixed, but there were some genuinely nice moments in there. 3.5/5

Get Certified is short, sweet and speaks for itself. I love the concept and the Hitler portrait. I do wish the Q and A portion for lack of evilness could have been expanded a bit. 3.25/5

Fish Out of Water is well shot and decently acted. One of its plot devices has been rehashed to death (if my interpretation is correct) but I love this film for some reason that I can't explain right now. It tackles discrimination, identity and family in such a short time (in contrast it took I America ~100 minutes to try to do the same thing.) 4.5/5

At first, Forever Natin looked like it was shot as a series of Instagram videos, but it does have a romantic hook that can be seriously affecting for some. Not me, I'm probably too jaded. But it's pretty interesting if its concepts float your boat. 3.5/5

---

Two more feature films and I'm done with the competition entries for this year's festival. So far I haven't seen a film that I really, REALLY liked, but I've been hearing good buzz on these last two films, so I haven't lost hope yet.

I also like the fact that people are disagreeing on which films they like or don't like. I've heard some good arguments why a film I didn't like was great for some, and vice versa. More discussion = more discourse. So keep on disagreeing, everyone.

Next up (hopefully), Nora Aunor's contribution to this year's festival.

Sunday, August 07, 2016

Cinemalaya 2016: Kusina, Dagsin, I America, Shorts A

Kusina introduces us to Juanita, an eager child who learns the art of cooking from her grandmother. Over the rest of the film, we see Juanita grow from child to teen to adult, as she decides to center her life around cooking food.

The film is filmed in a peculiar way; it takes place on only one set -  the titular kitchen - and resembles a filmed play more than anything else. Although I doubted whether it would work in the end or not, the positives far outweigh the negatives. Thanks to the way the movie is filmed, Kusina gains a stream of consciousness-like flow, much like how your life flashes before your eyes before death.

Each stage of life or each person is represented by a particular dish. A rebellious child is represented by leche flan; heartache and passion through spicy ginataan. Juanita's life is far from perfect, as her dedication to her craft has its share of consequences.

Judy Ann Santos returns to movies after 2014's T'yanak, and most of the film depends on her to make it work. She more or less succeeds in doing this, dishing out a notable performance as the adult Juanita. Her emotional turmoil brings out the best out of certain scenes, especially during the climax. The rest of the acting is a mixed bag, but Elora Espano deserves credit for her supporting performance.

Kusina is an interesting experiment that works, thanks to the strength of its lead actor and some very clever editing. 

Dagsin means gravity, and although I think it's the gravity of the 'bodies falling to earth' type, I think the "gravity" in Dagsin can take a whole different meaning in the context of this film.

The movie is about an elderly man, Justino (Tommy Abuel) who has just recently lost his beloved wife Corazon. Everyday he takes a gun to his head, does a little Russian roulette and pulls the trigger. Through a series of flashbacks we see how this man's life has been a series of endless regrets and tragedies, offset only by the happiness brought by his wife.

That said, the movie takes a long time to get off the ground. The movie goes forward through two timelines - first we see how Justino and Corazon meet and fall in love, and then we go back to the present day, where Justino is looked after by his adopted daughter Mercy (Lotlot de Leon.)

The two parts don't mesh together that well. The film could have touched upon building the relationship between Justino and Mercy in the present day, but they don't really have much of an emotional arc. Memories during Martial Law are relegated to dinner conversations, and the dark secret being hinted at in the film's synopsis is addressed once, sort of implied, but not fleshed out. (In retrospect, this might be the point.) The film just takes us around in circles until we get to the climax of the film, where we realize just how deep Justino's pain is - but by this time it's too late to have any sort of satisfying emotional conclusion.

I do admire Tommy Abuel doing what he can with the material, with what is probably one of this year's standout performances. Throughout the whole film you really feel for Justino and sort of understand why he feels the way he feels, the gravity of his life bearing down on his soul.

Dagsin ends up as an idea that feels incompletely realized. I thought the premise had potential, but tis execution fell short of what it could have been.

We end today's slew of full length reviews with I America, Ivan Payawal's sophomore film. And I have to say I was pretty impressed. It's like the director took everything that felt wrong in his first film, 2015's The Comeback, and improved upon it; creating a solid character study/drama-comedy about Amerasians in the Philippines.

Bela Padilla is Erica, who uses her mixed-race looks to get supporting gigs in commercials. She has a dream of making it to America with her father, with whom she keeps in contact frequently. She's just a step from this dream when she realizes something that turns her world upside down.

Bela Padilla carries this movie, just as Kaye Abad carried The Comeback. She's great in both comedic scenes (of which there are many) and dramatic scenes. Erica's pains are the pains of people just like her, lost children, borne of two worlds, stuck in a culture of their own, surrounded by a sense of uncertainty in their identities and in their futures.

While there are a lot of funny scenes in I America, the tone is far more consistent this time around, and dramatic moments pop out all the better because of it. There are a few scenes, perhaps to shine certain characters in an unfavorable light, that I find unnecessary; but this time it all boils down to a matter of taste. The movie does touch on some issues Amerasians also experience with each other - including the differences in how we as a culture view half Caucasians and half African Americans.

Erica's journey is one that we gladly take together, and the little realization at the end - you'll know it if you haven't realized it already - caps off what is a fine addition to this year's edition.

-------

WE WANT SHORT SHORTS Cinemalaya 2016 Short Shorts Reviews

Set A

Bugtaw has an interesting premise. I like the animation in this one, and the uncertain ending. I also appreciate the symmertry in these two boys who lack a proper father figure and can only dream of them. 3.25/5
Ang Maangas, Ang Marikit at Ang Makata is a short that I've already seen before. This time around I was able to appreciate more of the wit and humor in the script that I didn't notice during my first viewing of the film. 4/5
Mansyong Papel feels like the Cliff's Notes version of a full length movie. A lot of the movie depends on context and the lack of context really does a job on the film. It ends up very clunky. 2/5
Nakauwi Na has a premise that is as predictable as it can be, but its treatment is entertaining nevertheless. 3.75/5
Pektus is witty, but I wanted more from the climax for it to emotionally pay off. It's still one of my top picks out of the five films of Shorts A. 3.75/5

Four more movies and Shorts B tomorrow. See you then!

Saturday, August 06, 2016

Cinemalaya 2016: 1-2-3 (opening film)

After a year of preparation, Cinemalaya comes back from a semi-hiatus. There are a lot of things to be excited about in this year's festival, including partnerships with Eiga Sai and film screenings for interesting films from the local independent scene and abroad. In a way, it's appropriate that the opening film for this year's festival is a film made by an alumnus.

The film in question is 1-2-3 (Wan Tu Tri, no relation to the Tito Vic and Joey film) by Carlo Obispo, who was responsible for 2013's Purok 7.

1-2-3 deals with underaged workers in the sex industry. The Philippines is a hotbed for underground sex tourism, and greedy or desperate individuals are all too eager to provide the supply of flesh. The industry does not discriminate between genders, either; throughout the film we see both male and female sex workers serving their foreign (and sometimes domestic) clientele.

The story is framed through the eyes of Luis (Carlos Dala,) a teenage boy in search of his sister, who left their sleepy fishing village through rather dodgy circumstances. He eventually finds his sister, Lulu (Barbara Miguel, who notably played the lead role in Cinemalaya 2013's Nuwebe) working in a brothel in the city. She's paid well for her activities, and although Luis would want nothing more than to take his sister back home, she has no intention to do so.

It all sounds like heavy stuff, but surprisingly the movie is lighter than expected. There are a lot of scenes where the main characters are just being kids - fooling around, playing with friends, and falling in love for the first time. It feels like the juxtaposition of childhood innocence and the grim reality of drug related executions in Obispo's Purok 7. In both cases, the tonal dissonance seen in the two films could be interpreted as the film rebelling against a premature initiation into adult life, a dogged insistence that these kids are still kids, despite the shit they are going through. In many scenes there are short cuts to children playing and living normal lives - something the characters yearn for but are unable to do. The characters in 1-2-3 are slaves in gilded cages, privy to small luxuries that they receive from their patrons. But they have little to no freedom over their lives or their bodies.

The performances from the three main leads help the film immensely. Talented child actress Therese Malvar rounds out our trio of protagonists, and her scenes with Carlos Dala's character are natural and brimming with chemistry. Barbara Miguel has leveled up from her days in Nuwebe, perhaps partly due to the fact that this film has a better script.

The film does have a few problems. While it does have a satisfying emotional arc, the last act of the film feels a bit rushed. The discordant tone of the film may be a hard sell for people looking for something a bit more serious, and it could be argued that it may take away from the gravity of the subject matter. Rather ominously, the final scene reveals that although things for our protagonists have changed, the status quo remains the same. 

1-2-3 is a mixed bag, but personally I had a good time with this one. It's a bit darker than the film that came before it, and the way it was constructed might not sit still with everyone. But some amazing performances really help it in the end.

Saturday, July 23, 2016

Star Trek Beyond

The third film in the rebooted Star Trek franchise had a lot to live up to. It comes on the heels of Into Darkness, a film that many enjoyed at first. But once the hype settled down, its flaws stood out in full force. At one point it might have been the last gasp in a rebooted franchise that seemed to be winding down. And finally, to top it all off, 2016 was the 50th anniversary of Star Trek.

Thankfully, Star Trek Beyond is an enjoyable spectacle whose themes capture much of the spirit of the original series. It's not the best of the Star Trek films, but it's good enough to duke it out with the best of them.

Simon Pegg and Doug Jung get out of the rut caused by Into Darkness by 1) ignoring the events of that movie and 2) moving out of the origin story vibe that the first two films had. They instead throw us deep into the middle of James T. Kirk's legendary five year mission. He's going through the motions now, and is accustomed to the goings on of long term space travel. After a pretty disastrous diplomatic mission, he's in dire need of a break. Soon, however, events conspire to take him to a remote planet where he and his crew have to brave the wilderness and an enemy that wants to destroy what the Federation stands for.

The movie isn't as epic as the previous two films, and that's fine. Star Trek Beyond features action, but its progression is gradual and gives you space to breathe, unlike the two Abrams movies whose action scenes came one after the other. Instead of action we get character development and an expansion of the dynamic between Kirk and the other characters. Previously it's always been Spock and Kirk, but this time we find our crew paired up in unconventional ways, including a Spock - McCoy pair that's quite a genius move. There's humor in spades - probably the most humorous Trek film since The Voyage Home - and the films humor plays on each character's eccentricities, giving the film a natural flow.

There's actually an interesting philosophical conversation in the film with regards to the Federation and its guiding principles, and it extends to the very idea of Star Trek itself. Star Trek Beyond's villain, a large, menacing creature played by Idris Elba, is every bit as tragic as any great Trek villain. His philosophy is that division is far more effective than the unity of species in the Federation. His fleet of attack ships, small personnel-sized craft that attack en masse, is a reflection of that philosophy as well as an ironic mirror. He is a soldier with no war to fight, and he struggles to create the conflict that he craves. But the film reminds us that above all else, Star Trek is a series about explorers, not soldiers; a stark contrast to the militarization of science fiction stories in contemporary media. That's what set it apart from the rest of the series 50 years ago, and that's what sets it apart even now: some of the best episodes of Trek were always about understanding alien races and venturing into the unknown, instead of wantonly blowing everything up. It's a concept a lot of people, even fellow Trek fans, forget these days.

The rest of the character development depends on our understanding of the series; of course we don't see these characters develop during their five year mission in the movies. Instead, we rely upon our knowledge of the original series to know that this crew isn't just a crew during these five years -  they're more of a family. The one downfall of the film is that the character motivations of the villains are not as fleshed out as I would have liked - a victim of keeping certain plot details secret. The main antagonist's raison d'etre feels feeble compared to Khan's destructive revenge, or Soran's desperate attempt to 'turn back time,' or Chang's adherence to the old ways of the warrior.

The movie scales back on the fanservice, which had reached unreasonable levels in the previous film. But the small moments of fanservice that remain, including references to both Star Trek Enterprise and the Original Series, hit at just the right moments. There are also tributes to Leonard Nimoy and Anton Yelchin, who both passed away before the movie could be shown. One very poignant scene has McCoy and Kirk drinking a bottle of booze from Chekov's stash, and there's one extra glass in there as they drink together - a subtle nod to absent friends.

There's one scene in the movie that really broke me emotionally, and it's near the end when Zachary Quinto's Spock looks at a particular photograph. At that very moment in the cinema I remembered all of the people - whether cast or crew or fans - that have left us ever since the first episode of the Original Series premiered 50 years ago. I remembered my aunt, herself a big Trek fan, the one person who introduced me to Trek, who died a month before this movie was shown in theaters. That scene did me in. It's a rare moment in cinema when you can encapsulate all those 50 years of history and fandom into one movie, one scene. I think, at least in that respect, Pegg and company nailed it.

Sunday, July 17, 2016

ToFarm Filmfest 2016: Pauwi Na, Paglipay

ToFarm Filmfest is a new film festival whose themes are unique compared to other contemporaries: their films tackle the struggles of farmers and the bounty of nature.  Out of the six films in the festival I managed to catch two of them. Here's my thoughts on both.

Aside from a few vegetables in one scene at the start, Paolo Villaluna's Pauwi Na has little to do with farming. That's fine, however, as this quirky family has an interesting story to tell.

At first, it details the everyday life of Pepe, a pedicab driver (Bembol Roco), his laundrywoman wife (Cherry Pie Picache), their snarky street vendor daughter (Chai Fonacier), petty criminal son (Jerald Napoles) and blind, pregnant daughter in law (Meryll Soriano.) Meryll's character can also see Jesus for some reason, though he mainly exists to smoke cigarettes and deliver snark, with the occasional helping hand.

Pauwi Na becomes a road movie about a third of the way through as Pepe decides to move back to the province using two pedicabs. Their journey together as a family is full of hardships, but the story has moments of levity that keep it from being too dark. Overall, thanks to superb performances by the cast, the film can be considered a comedy. And while the final few acts have their share of shortcomings, the movie does have a relatively satisfying ending.

Black and white shots in slow motion are scattered throughout the film. At times they serve as metaphor or as framing devices. At times they serve as strange parallels, showing the family having fun when they clearly are not in real life. Plus, its usage during the ending credits is quite memorable.

Other than that, I can't really pinpoint exactly why I like this film. I have no idea why I like this film as much as I do. I think it's not bad, but it's not excellent either. There are too many things that on the surface, I would normally perceive as weaknesses. We don't really know why Pepe took his family on a wild journey through the countryside. The self discovery aspect only works for a few characters. The significance of the Jesus character remains a mystery. The point of the whole trip, its message of social change, is a bit muddled. But there's something in the way the movie is made that makes it at least interesting. The journey itself is interesting, even though we see neither concrete purpose nor destination in it.


But I guess that's the point. Pepe's family is one that sticks together through thick and thin, despite all the shit the world throws at us. It's a family that's ready to sacrifice for the sake of its own members. It's a family bound together by love and understanding above all. In a sense it does seem to reflect the strong ties Filipino families have in general. Like the poster proclaims, they are the Filipino family.

It's framed through a simple love story, but Paglipay is also about the ever changing state of life, as the old world begins to fade away into the new.

Atan, a young Aeta man, goes to the lowlands to raise money for his dowry, as he is to be married as soon as he collects the necessary amount. In the vast farmlands of Zambales he works tirelessly. But there, he finds his heart wandering: a college girl named Rain tests his heart. 

His dilemma reflects his people's attitudes towards the changing times. While previously an isolated society that was largely homogenous, the eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the early nineties created a shift in the lives of the Aeta. Forced to live in the lowlands, mixed relationships between Aetas and non-Aeta folk increased. Early on in the film Atan declares that curly haired people belong with fellow curly haired people, but soon that resolve is tested.

At the same time, we see signs of a world that is changing, whether the Aeta like it or not. Mining prospects come to the communities, threatening the health of its constituents; at the same time, the weather patterns are changing, with less crops to harvest.

The love story is simple in ways many mainstream films have forgotten. The film does not swerve into melodrama or fantastic situations. It merely places these two people together and lets the story flow by itself. Their eventual decisions are believable and ultimately human.

The drone shots in this film are notable, as they manage to show the lahar infused expanse of Zambales. While the story is a personal one and many of its frames are up close and personal, these wider, epic shots give me the impression that we are but small creatures compared to the enormity of the world around us. And the movie's ending, where everything ends up in the natural scheme of things, seems to follow that notion.

Eiga Sai 2016: Crossroads, The Great Passage, Flying Colors

Crossroads (no relation to the Britney Spears movie) deals with international volunteerism, wherein citizens from first world countries give their expertise to help impoverished or developing communities. I personally have mixed feelings about the subject, but I decided to give this movie a try and see if it could change my mind.

Our main character, Sawada, has a rather cynical opinion about the whole thing. This puts him at odds with fellow volunteer, Hamura, whose views are more idealistic. The rest of the film is more or less a clash of views between the two individuals as they go to the Philippines and help communities in Benguet. On paper it looks like a decent setup.

The reality, on the other hand, is quite different. Crossroads, to put it simply, is not very well made. It exists in a magical universe where all Filipinos always speak English, even when speaking to other Filipinos. No Tagalog, Ilocano, or Ibaloi is spoken anywhere. One could argue that it's for the sake of consistency, but the Japanese subtitles that are present in all of the English speaking scenes give that argument little weight. The film reads like it was written by an outsider to the Philippines, which makes a lot of situations extremely strange to the native viewer.

The acting is generally not very good, either. The only actors that give anything close to a decent performance are Dai Watanabe and Tao Okamoto, and their performances suffer due to a terrible script. But no one takes the bad acting cake more than "Queen of Cosplay" Alodia Gosiengfiao. While she's a decent cosplayer, she has the acting presence of a piece of cardboard, and more often than not seems to be reading lines instead of acting. The notion that she's lived with her (considerably more grubby) brother Noel in a harsh mining town environment also stretches common sense.

The film seems to make the point that Sawada and Hamura's ideas combined, combining compassion and practicality, is the best solution, but the film does not do a good job communicating this, either: in the end, Hamura's plan is far less successful than the plan conceived by the locals indirectly under the care of Sawada - Sawada didn't even give them any ideas towards that plan.

Crossroads does tackle a few pertinent issues like the dangers of mining and its effect on indigenous communities, but overall it's not worth the watch.

[I'd actually watched Yuya Ishii's The Great Passage a while back on RED, so I decided to tidy up my (then pending) short review and post it on here.]

Based on Shiwon Miura's novel, The Great Passage is a romance film that has a uniquely Japanese flavor. It's paced leisurely compared to its western counterparts and patiently takes its time to tell the story of Majima (Ryuusei Matsuda), a shy salesman who gets roped into the creation of a dictionary. The work is meticulous, taxing and will take years to complete - the perfect job for a man like him.

The film's Japanese title, Fune wo Amu, reflects the film's love of the Japanese language. Amu could mean to compile (as in a dictionary) or to weave, thus literally the title means "To compile/weave a boat," and in this context the boat is metaphorical, the kind of boat that, in one character's words, "sails the sea of words." Our protagonists scour conversations of the people around them, collecting as much words as possible - words that, in the span of months or years, could either flourish or disappear into obscurity.

Supporting Majima (and forming the third point in this man-woman-language triangle) is Kaguya (Aoi Miyazaki), who quickly takes a liking to the shy man and helps him bloom socially. Her love is seldom overt, expressed in simple gestures, in cold meals untouched, in patience.

It's a relatively light film, filled with moments that make more sense if you read between the lines. I'm a Shiwon Miura fan now, btw.

Finally, I'd actually talked a bit about Flying Colors (a.k.a. Biri Gyaru) when I went to Japan last year, and I correctly predicted it would be featured in this year's Eiga Sai. Even if I knew the outcome to the real life story (and by extension, the movie), it's no less entertaining or moving, because, as with all these 'ganbatte!' films, the journey is often more important than the destination.

Based on a best selling novel, the movie is about the journey of Sayaka (Kasumi Arimura), from being dead last in class (with the educational level of a fourth grader) to taking on the entrance exams for Keio University, known for its brutal entrance exams and low passing rate.

University entrance exams in Japan are quite competitive, and this movie takes a look into Japan's culture of studying. Aside from normal eight to five classes, many students go to Juku, or Cram Schools, where they undertake additional studies to be able to prepare for and enter the college of their choice. Some pass their first or second choice. Others fail the entrance exams and become 'Ronin,' studying outside the school system until the next examination period.

Sayaka's journey through studying is relentless, as she changes her lifestyle and discards her partygoing life for this singular purpose. She stumbles across several roadblocks along the way - sources of dramatic tension - but she always trudges forward nevertheless.

This story's unsung hero is Tsubota (Atsushi Ito), the cram school teacher who mentors and guides our heroine through her struggle. He's the kind of teacher you wish you had in high school or in college, the kind of teacher who believes in you no matter what, through failure or triumph. His interactions with the students are touching and a bit inspirational, as cheesy as that may sound.

It's a feel good movie with a lot of positive life lessons. Unless you're a heartless cynic, the movie's message and spirit is quite infectious.

----------------

Tomorrow's the last day of Eiga Sai in Shangrila Cineplex, but you can catch the film fest in other places, including Cinemalaya and in the provinces, in subsequent dates.

Monday, July 11, 2016

Eiga Sai ++ 2016: August in Tokyo, The Boy and the Beast, Our Little Sister, Initiation Love

It's Eiga Sai time! Aside from this year's offering I've been able to see some other Japanese films recently, so I'm including them into the mix too. Enjoy~

Intersecting Love: August in Tokyo

August in Tokyo begins with a sequence of scenes that seem out of place with the rest of the movie. But it does work out in the end eventually, so it does pay off. Also, it makes the title of the film (Ai no chiisana rekishi, roughly translated as 'a short history of love') meaningful in a way.

The movie tells two narrative threads that run mostly in parallel until the end. They both deal with reconnecting with people and all the emotional baggage that comes with it. In contrast with the majority of Eiga Sai offerings it's definitely a low budget production. There are a few comedic moments, but the focus is mainly on drama. 

Guilt anchors the two protagonists in their decisions in this film; they are tethers that keep them from moving forward. Once the tethers are broken, the emotional climax of the film starts.

It's not a film for everyone, as the cheaply shot production of some of the scenes may turn off some. But for me it manages to create solid drama without being melodramatic, and its final payoff really ties everything together in an emotionally satisfying manner.

Light Summer Anime: The Boy and the Beast

I'd actually come across Studio Chizu and Mamoru Hosoda's The Boy and the Beast while it was showing in Japanese theaters last year. An all star cast (that included acting faves Koji Yakusho and Aoi Miyazaki) was only icing on a delicious cake of talent responsible for works such as the wonderful Wolf Children and the anime adaptation of The Girl Who Leapt Through Time.

The movie tells the tale of a young boy, Ren, who wanders into another world populated by beasts. Soon after he is taken in by the brash Kumatetsu to be his student. He grows up in this world, raised by beasts, when suddenly he finds himself able to return to the human world.

The story is great, but it's not as fully realized as that of Hosoda's other works. The training sequences are very entertaining, and help us empathize with Kumatetsu and his world, but once Ren finds himself wandering back in the human world, there's a certain level of incompleteness to his development. (Perhaps the movie would have been better served as a short series.)

Still, Hosoda manages to bring his distinctive style of visual storytelling into the mix, and does what he can with the time limitations of the film. It goes without saying that the film is visually amazing, and the few action sequences are expertly choreographed. The cast is very solid all around, with veteran screen actors joined by distinguished anime seiyuu.

The Boy and the Beast is entertaining summer fare, but ends up just OK compared to Studio Chizu's previous works.

A Scene at the Sea: Our Little Sister

Hirokazu Kore'eda has made some really great movies in the past 10 or so years, which includes his award winning Nobody Knows. He's mellowed down a bit, but his distinctive style still remains, and his movies still mostly focus on the Japanese family.

Based on the manga Umemachi Diary (also the Japanese title of the movie) Our Little Sister begins and ends with a funeral. You'd think that the movie is dark and dreary, but the film is actually quite light, relatively speaking. It's about three sisters, who, upon attending the funeral of their recently deceased father, find out they have a younger sister (Suzu Hirose.) They invite her to live with them in the ancestral home in the sleepy mountain town of Kamakura, and the film mostly follows them as they go about everyday life.

The storytelling in this film is very restrained. I've heard the word 'patient' being used to describe it, and I wholeheartedly agree. Despite it being generally a light comedy, there's a tinge of melancholy in this film that touches upon what goes on with the characters behind the scenes. There's a sense of lost childhood, of bonds bent and broken beyond repair, of things growing old and moving on. The Japanese call this notion mono no aware, the pathos of things, the sense that people die and move on, and the sense that that's the reality of life. It's a notion that embodies most of Kore'eda's work, as well as many other esteemed Japanese directors both past (Ozu comes to mind) and present.

The production is buoyed by a superb cast (probably the cutest four siblings in Japanese film to date) and moody instrumentals composed by Yoko Kanno. Certain visuals, such as the scene with the fireworks or Suzu Hirose's trip through the 'tunnel' are unforgettable. Our Little Sister is one of my favorite films of his, and I can't help but want to read the manga after watching this.

Eiga Sai is showing every day at the Shangrila Cineplex until July 17th, and later at other venues. Admission is free.

Other Japanese Films I Saw Last Week (not shown at Eiga Sai)

Retro Romance: Initiation Love

One of Initiation Love's selling points is the big twist at the last five minutes that completely changes the meaning of the film. Since the film itself made me promise not to divulge that twist, I won't reveal it here. But the twist's effectiveness hinges on how you interpret the rest of the movie.

Set in 1980's Japan (accompanied by that era's greatest Japanese love hits,) Initiation Love is divided into two segments, like a cassette tape: Side A and Side B. Side A is a sweet tale about a 'no girlfriend since birth' kinda guy who gets infatuated with, and later starts dating, a cute girl. In many respects it mirrors the best of mainstream rom com love stories.

Side B, on the other hand, is a completely different monster. Darker in tone, it completely deconstructs the themes of this first half. While it manages to avoid completely going over the rails with its drama, the overall effect feels kinda clunky.

The film banks on nostalgia (the end credits actually explain some of the 80's references made by the film) and the narrative trick it employs at the end. The ending is a bit inconclusive but again, it kind of depends on which Side you liked best. It makes you want to revisit the film again, and see if some characters that initially came off as charming now seem manipulative. (In any case, the film does give a few clues to the nature of this twist even early on.)

The film is a mixed bag. Fans of Atsuko Maeda will no doubt enjoy this, as she gives a really great performance in this one.

Saturday, July 09, 2016

Ma'Rosa and the Economy of Corruption

Ma'Rosa starts off with a lengthy sequence of buying, haggling and selling, as Rosa (Jacklyn Jose) interacts with the people of her neighborhood, not only as the proprietor of the local sari-sari store, but also as a small time drug dealer. 

And the nature of transactions, both monetary and social, underline the point of Ma'Rosa: it is not simply a treatise on the nature of the country's drug marketplace, it is an exploration of the social structures that enable this marketplace to exist in the first place. To say that the film is simply about drugs fails to see its underlying themes. It's about the culture of corruption in Philippine society, and how the transactions we make with people turn our society into a twisted flea market of human lives and dignity, a cesspool where the powerful and the oppressed engage in a warped capitalist trade fueled by greed and money.

Rosa and her husband are quickly arrested by the police, and this is where the true meat of the story begins. Instead of properly arresting the couple, they are given a deal to rat out higher level members of their organization in exchange for their freedom.

"Baka pwede naman nating pagusapan ito" (maybe we can talk about this) is a phrase found in almost every Filipino's armory of words, spanning all social classes. It's one of the lynchpins of a culture that prefers 'areglo' and compromise instead of prolonging an uncomfortable situation, and it digs its rotten roots into every situation in this film. And why does this particular aspect of Filipino culture flourish? There is no single cause, but Ma'Rosa shows a few interrelated factors to us through its situations. 

Firstly, there is a certain discontent with the slow, lumbering hulk of bureaucracy and red tape; and this is the same impatience that leads us to execute 'criminals' without due process, and try and shame people on social media instead of going to the inefficient courts. Second, in all of the characters of the film, there is the sheer will to survive in a world that has deemed survival of the fittest the one true law above all, and where everyone is equal, but some people are more equal than others. Rosa and her children make almost every possible sacrifice to get out of their situation: their minds, bodies, their ideals and principles. And finally, as we learn that Rosa and her family is just one link in a chain of victims, the nature of our very culture encourages us to extend the chain instead of breaking it.

Rosa's choice to engage in the drug trade also reflects this notion of survival, and it is felt in Jacklyn Jose's actions throughout the film. Every action she makes is calculated for the survival of her family. She knows that she is engaged in illegal activities, but she accepts that as her fate. And yet twice in the film, during her arrest and at the very end of the film, we see her looking at a family engaged in honest work. Perhaps it is a look of temptation, or perhaps it is one of regret. In my (perhaps overly optimistic) interpretation: she is contemplating the possibility of an honest life. But the look of uncertainty she gives after that implies a future that is rocky and uncertain.

WPFF 2016: Daughters of the Three Tailed Banner

 
There's a certain flavor of silence that pervades Daughters of the Three Tailed Banner, first part of Teng Mangansakan's moro2mrw film project. It's the kind of silence that penetrates the mundane, the everyday, and pretense masked as professionalism, but it is a silence that is pregnant with meaning. May it be deep seated regret over choices made in the past, uncertainty towards a future that remains hidden, or the sheer will to survive, it is a silence shared by all of the women in this movie.

And women comprise the majority of the players in this film, as it is their movie -  that of the struggle of the Moro woman in uncertain times. Its setting, the eve of the proclamation of the new Bangsamoro government, reflects these women's own insecurities as they move forward, at times blindly, into an uncertain future.The film tells us of a society of women where the men have been taken from them, either through war, circumstance or their own choice. And in the middle, the all-important notion that the family line must continue, no matter what.

Despite their changing circumstances, the female protagonists of Daughters of the Three Tailed Banner are drawn back to the status quo, either out of a sense of familial duty, or an inability or reluctance to embrace change.

It's a tale told with remarkable and sometimes challenging subtlety. The plot is not spoon-fed to the audience; instead we learn it through knowing looks of silence, scraps of information and hidden meaning. In the end, thematically we witness a rebirth, an unshackling of sorts in both narrative threads. I hope the next film gets made.

Thursday, July 07, 2016

WPFF 2016: Ringgo the Dog Shooter

Ringgo (Sandino Martin) is a dog shooter. No, he doesn't shoot dogs with drugs or bullets, he's the guy that helps dogs in heat mate with other dogs. One day, after his mentor is put out of commission by some illness (acted like a heart attack, looks like a stroke) he is recruited by dog lover Bong (Janice de Belen) to help take care of her dogs.

The dog metaphors are piled on thick from the start. Ringgo is like a wild dog himself during most of the first half of the film: he is easily distracted, he is impulsive, rude and uncouth, and he is prone to numerous doglike behavioral tics (props to Sandino Martin for making it mostly work.) At the same time, he comes across one of Bong's rescued dogs, Inca, whose past history of abuse mirrors his own. He begins to form a bond with the dog.

Bong's character tames Ringgo as he does the same to Inca, and the central theme of the film has something to do with the struggle between his animal instincts and his humanity and compassion. It asks us if people who have been so badly damaged by fate are worth saving. Conceptually, it's good stuff.

Unfortunately, the execution betrays the concept's promise. The film's tone is uneven and confusing. At times it pretends to be a gritty social realist film, while at other times it descends into overwrought, even cheesy melodrama. A romantic sideplot feels rushed, and ultimately turns out to be inconsequential. While some of the film's characters are LGBT, it doesn't really offer anything new, idea-wise, to the existing body of LGBT themed works. The drama is ramped up to ridiculous  levels especially near the climax, leading to a rather cringeworthy sequence where characters exchange high fives after all is said and done. And let's not forget the huge fake looking penis and the cartoonishly grotesque torrent of blood that gushed out of... some imaginary artery... during said climax.

You can ignore some of the cheese and the more superfluous elements and end up with a relatively enjoyable experience, but you're left with only the barest of bones to gnaw on.

Sunday, May 15, 2016

Red Quickie: Baby, Baby, Baby!

With its declining birth rate, Japan isn't churning out babies like it used to. The Japanese seem to be either too busy to start families, or view the whole exercise as too expensive to get into. 2009's Baby, Baby Baby! takes a very mainstream Japanese look into the whole business of getting pregnant. Feisty protagonist Yoko (Arisa Suzuki) is a career woman who realizes she is pregnant, the result of a somewhat crazy evening. She decides to keep the baby and we follow her into her journey of self discovery.

The movie unfortunately does not subvert any societal expectations; Yoko, like many Japanese women, quits her job to focus on the baby full time, while the baby's father, Tetsuya, faces the prospect of abandoning his relatively carefree life to be able to become the breadwinner. There is no rebellion against social norms, no attempt by Yoko to hold onto her career, instead, all of the characters slowly fit into their pre-assigned societal slots by the end of the film.

The film also touches on issues on reproductive health, such as infertility, contraception, managing a large family, and other minor issues. However, the film doesn't really go deeper into these issues, nor does it address the larger picture behind Japan's declining fertility rate. Instead we get a somewhat ridiculous scene where everyone gives birth at the same time. I guess symbolically there's something in that. Baby, Baby Baby! is light fare, and unfortunately that's all it ends up being.

Sunday, April 24, 2016

Sinag Maynila 2016 Festival Report!

Sinag Maynila is now on its second year. Last year was great in terms of output; what does this year have in store for us?

Set in the snakelike roads of the mountainous North, Dyamper is part slice of Northern life, part tale of redemption - in a manner of speaking. Our three main characters make a living stealing stuff from the backs of trucks. For most of the film our protagonists mope around, get high on mushrooms and fool around the countryside.

The mountains (like the 'healing Forest of Fire' in the film) serve as a place of rebirth, where one can discard their old selves and become someone brand new. For one of our protagonists, Tinio, this rebirth is hardly gumdrops and sunshine - one can almost interpret the new life as purgatory, a stark new reality that one initially rejects, but comes to accept. He does learn later on that his past will always be part of him, for better or worse.

The film is not perfect; it tends to meander a bit, and the pace is deliberate, much like De Guzman's earlier Diablo (2013.) The film's character development is a bit undercooked in some parts, and Tinio's two companions are relegated to supporting characters.

The ending is ambiguous, yet ominous - the very act of jumping in this film is, in a way, a mechanism of change - our characters jump into uncertain futures, to end life or to begin life anew.

What seems like a mundane domestic dramedy quickly evolves upon viewing Adolfo Alix's Mrs. In the context of the film, "Mrs." takes on different translations - that of the sole master of a dilapidated house, as a mother of a lost friend, and as a sister. 

Elizabeth Oropesa delivers a fantastic performance as Virginia, a mother tethered to her old family house - a sentiment that is half stubbornness and half a sense of wanting closure for her desaparecido son. Her heart and soul embody themselves in the old house: rickety pianos and furniture, ceilings of water-stained wood, deep cracks in the walls like cracks in her own heart. And yet, even during earthquakes of emotional turmoil, her heart - and the house -  still stands.

In contrast, Oropesa is joined by Lotlot De Leon as Delia, whose character tends to the house and keeps Virginia company. Her childlike naivete leads her into her own pit, and she has her own burdens to bear.

These two women are not alone: throughout the film we meet women who bear the pain of loss and women who try to seek meaning in their lives - which is another way the title can be interpreted. I'd like to think there's a strong feminist current in the film, but all of the characters' scars can be traced back to the loss of a man in their lives, so it's not as clear if the notion holds water.

The film's narrative structure is a bit abstract; it may be more a slice of life (and death) than Dyamper was. It does paint an emotional picture of these women, but it just stops, leaving the ending ambiguous, perhaps leaving the task of resolution to us instead.

The jazzy soundtrack of Expressway gives it a noir kind of feel. Its narrative territory is a place where we've been before: it's the classic  story of two assassins, an old veteran and an eager newbie, which has been addressed in some way in films like On the Job and to a lesser extent, Tandem (with robbery instead of assassination.) The plot is quite predictable, knowing how these kinds of things go. Half the fun of Expressway is, however, the ride itself.

First off, our two characters are interesting, and not in the usual ways. Ben, the old veteran, is haunted by his past actions; the ghosts of his victims are catching up to him. His apprentice Morris, on the other hand, breaks the stereotype of the naive rookie - Morris is extremely narcissistic, even psychopathic in some aspects. In no way is he painted as a sympathetic character. And yet, thanks to Ben's attachment to his deceased son, a weird father-son dynamic forms.

Expressway visually oozes style. It paints its frames in lurid Christmas lights of red and green, or in the warm orange of highway streetlights. Its style is punctuated with brutal explosions of violence and sex, more often than not, perpetrated by our two hitmen. Its main cast is also capable. Though I did enjoy Aljur Abrenica's psychotic character, he tends to oversell it sometimes, which gives away the twist of the film around 20 minutes in.

Expressway is overall an enjoyable ride. For me, it's reminiscent of Ato Bautista's early DV films in the mid 2000s. 

From the start, Lila throws every horror filmmaking technique at us: clever blocking, jump cuts out of nowhere, the random audio cue here and there. It probably won't leave an impression except to the horror rookie. It's mostly well shot, but none of the scary images really stick. It tries to create tension, but there isn't much of that, either. It has a mystery that is predicated on the protagonist's complete lack of curiosity (and an elementary-grade reading speed.)

The film foreshadows a lot of things so heavily, that you know something is up about five minutes into it. Then again, our main characters are painfully oblivious to the fact that bad things are happening around them, so we are left to watch, frustrated, as our protagonists wander around helplessly until the bloody climax.

The one thing I did like about the film was the caretaker character, played by Sherry Lara. She has a great moment at the climax of the film, which with its quick cut revolving camera is smothered in cliche, but Lara makes it work really well, making it the best scene of the movie for me.

Lila is a movie that would have worked better as a short film. It would have solved a lot of the pacing problems and mitigated some of its glaring plot holes.What we got, unfortunately, feels like a bad episode of Shake Rattle and Roll instead.

In contrast to Expressway, where the violence is overt, TPO (Temporary Protection Order) hides its violence and the aftermath, framing it behind walls, windows, even glass. In one scene, where Miguel beats his wife Teresa, we see the violence as if we are staring from the outside, placing us as voyeurs (on the positive side, perhaps the film puts us into the shoes of a concerned neighbor.) A similar technique was done with Jay Altarejos' 2014 effort Kasal.

Kasal depicted a gay couple striving for the right to get married and seeing their own relationship fall apart. This time, in TPO, we get to see the other side of the fence - a straight married couple, their marriage slowly disintegrating. We view this disintegration through a fractured timeline that flits between flashbacks and real time, showing moments from that marriage that ultimately contributed to its end.

The main cause of the marital strife stems from domestic abuse, but the factors that caused the end of their marriage go far deeper - conflicting desires for children and sex, a controlling, overbearing family,  cultural and societal factors - all come into play in this marriage's destruction. In particular, Miguel's father (played by character actor Menggie Cobarrubias) is a domineering, controlling presence in the couple's life. In many scenes he is positioned at the top of the frame, whether visually or through his voice, and at times he enters the scene from above like an overlord approaching his subjects. His outdated philosophy - that of the completely subservient wife that belongs in the kitchen - is passed down to his son, who takes out his frustrations on his wife.

The film possesses a trove of long shots, but it is the composition of these shots that deserve merit. Altarejos knows how to block his actors in a scene. While long, his shots are dynamic, splitting characters through inner frames, and having them move from background to foreground to emphasize their importance in a scene (the sequence with the school principal near the end being the prime example of this.) The angular architecture of stairwells and windows creates an oppressive, claustrophobic feeling, nooses around our characters' heads.

In the end, Miguel and Teresa's marriage lay autopsied and bare before us, and in that moment, the movie leaves us rather abruptly. The lack of true resolution may be a turnoff, but I guess that's the point - separations like this seldom end cleanly. It is a war that no one wins, as everyone involved incurs scars of some kind.


***

That's it for this year. There were two films I liked, two that were okay, and one that wasn't ok. I liked last year's program a lot more, but I do appreciate the variety they are attempting with these films. There's a shorts program for Sinag Maynila, however for some reason there's only one venue screening these films, and only for a short time. I hope as the festival grows, more attention could be paid to the Shorts section.

Friday, April 08, 2016

Short Reviews April 2016

Whistleblower makes it a point to declare that it is a work of fiction (twice, even - there's another mention during the closing credits). Of course, Filipinos will no doubt recognize the real life inspiration for this particular film. Right off the bat it's an interesting premise; unfortunately the film doesn't do much with the material.

At a very lean 82 minutes, the film feels incomplete. Characters come and go, with some characters existing solely to appear in one scene, never to appear again. Our two main characters, Zeny and Lorna, are the most fleshed out among the cast, but even they suffer from a gross lack of development. Zeny's relationship with her family seems perfunctory and limited to a few phone conversations; and while Lorna's character has some good moments, the script doesn't let her character grow. This culminates in an anti climactic resolution where one of the core moral dilemmas of the film is resolved in its last twenty seconds. We don't see the repercussions of any of the actions taken in this film - the film just decides to end itself and we are left hanging.

Then again, perhaps the goal of the movie is not to shed light on the act of exposing the truth, but rather to shed light on the rotting system itself, where people like Lorna and Zeny are made pawns in a machine of corruption that they are either unwilling or unable to truly escape. To its credit, the film did make me wonder what the hell happened to the real life court case this was based upon. It seems like most of it has been swept under the rug... at least until the upcoming elections are over and done with. But even this interpretation of the film is too gracious, in light of its many problems. Whistleblower is built upon an interesting foundation of ideas, but sadly comes up short when you get to the details.

I'm not going to beat around the bush for this one: I think 10 Cloverfield Lane is great, and it's best watched going in blind. Thanks to superb acting and a tightly scripted plot, it manages to create tension and fear in many creative ways.

While the very small cast (of only three main characters) collectively deserves praise, John Goodman's character practically steals the show. Over the course of the film your perception of his character will change, and Goodman makes it work really well. He manages to inject his imposing character with a bit of humanity, without becoming too weird or silly.

There's a vibe in this film that definitely evokes classic Twilight Zone episodes, in that the core mystery unravels itself in such a way that the payoff at the end feels right, at times chillingly so.

Bear McCreary, whom I know best from his work on the reimagined Battlestar Galactica series, does the soundtrack, which feels effective, while at the same time, pays homage to its spiritual predecessors (admittedly limited) score. As most of the movie is shot within an enclosed space, Jeff Cutter's DP work can switch from making the bunker look like an open, welcoming space, to a claustrophobic dungeon.


It makes for effective filmmaking, and it's one of the better films coming out this week.

Friday, April 01, 2016

April Fools Day 2016

We're almost up to 11 years now with this blog; unfortunately, I no longer have the time or resources to carry on. That is why I have handed over the reins of my blog to new authors who will continue maintaining the site. A number of inaugural posts have already been posted.

to access the site, click the link below:
NEW Present Confusion 2.0

thanks for 10 great years and May The Force Be With You.