I. The Life and Opinions of John Tawasil, Gentleman
I've been trying to get back into digital art recently. I first picked it up when I graduated from medical school in the late aughts. Back then, I used my laptop's trackpad to slowly copy a reference image, color it out while trying to be as close to the reference as possible, and add rudimentary effects. It was inefficient, laborious and it wasted a lot of time, but newly graduated me was burnt out from decades of continuous study and I needed something to take my mind off things. Decades after my first attempt I'm still not very good, but the process has made me understand light and shadows, perspective and framing, which in turn helps me whenever I watch movies or take photographs. Whenever I have downtime, which these days is almost always never, I use the drawing tablet I use for work and scribble something.
![]() |
| an example of one of those early attempts at digital art circa 2009. |
While drawing, I usually put something on in the background while I draw. Lately I've been using podcast episodes, but I ran out of those too. One particular kind of media I've been using as background noise recently is the vertical drama.
Vertical dramas (or microdramas) are an emerging form of media, one of the first borne from the new age of social media. The idea's been floating around for a while now - in the late 2010s, the format gained some popularity in China but really truly emerged into the public consciousness sometime around pandemic times. Hollywood tried to create a similar distribution model - infamously, Jeffrey Katzenberg launched the Quibi short-form streaming service that collapsed only a few months after it launched- though most of the popular microdrama distribution sites are backed by Chinese companies.
The format is relatively simple: short (1-3 minute) episodes of a story over 48-50 episodes, though very popular series have more. On these platforms, the first dozen or so episodes are free, with the rest of the story locked behind a paywall. The free tier stories are designed to end at a cliffhanger, encouraging the viewer to pay to see more of the story. These free stories often end up as ads on Facebook and Instagram, and many people (most likely including people you know) have spent dozens of minutes engrossed by one of these ads. I am one of those people.
II. Digressions, incontestably, are the sunshine
Robinsons Magnolia, or at least the building next to it, used to be an ice cream factory. That's where it got its name. Once home to the Magnolia Dairy Products Plant, the factory was transferred to another location and the land where it once stood was sold to Robinsons Corporation, who eventually redeveloped the land into a condominium and mall complex.
In between watching films from the local Puregold Cinepanalo Film Festival, I decided to go to Robinsons Magnolia in my decade long quest to watch every full length Filipino film of the 2020s. I've missed a handful of films at this point but I'll get to those films eventually. While walking through the lower food court, I saw signage from a local food establishment that was quite obviously generated by AI. From afar the food depicted in the signage looked like food, but as I drew closer to the picture I realized that the food did not make sense. What was supposed to be beef looked unnaturally symmetrical, and the way the vegetables were perforated triggered my trypophobia.
I made my way to the mall's top floor, where the cinemas were located. On the floor below, children ran and played in a small playground made up of plastic and metal tubes and nets. A couple of adults played in a pickleball court, and for some reason none of them could sustain a rally. On the same floor as the cinemas, a mass was being held as it was a Sunday. I immediately bought a ticket to the film I was supposed to watch: Rossana Hwang's Plump Blossom.
I had more than an hour left before the screening started so I headed down to Robinsons Magnolia's second, more upscale food court and passed the time by looking at vertical dramas while snacking on some yogurt.
III. awakened, i slayed my demon husband with a lightsaber and other stories
The Thirty Six Stratagems is a 6th century Chinese text that outlines military tactics and strategy, similar to Sun Tzu's The Art of War. In its fifth chapter, there is a stratagem that says 假痴不癲 - translated in Wikipedia as "feign madness but keep your balance" - that is, lower your profile so that the enemy lowers their guard and hangs themselves with their own rope, metaphorically speaking. In other words, this is the trope of "playing the pig to eat the tiger".
It is a trope that has both fictional and historical roots: in the 5th century BC, Goujian's kingdom was crushed by a rival state. The fallen state's king became the servant of the king who crushed his kingdom. With Goujian utterly subservient, his new master eventually deemed him harmless and sent him home. Goujian then bided his time, building up an army and creating internal strife in the kingdom that defeated his. Eventually he took revenge, destroying and annexing the kingdom that defeated him and killing his enemies. The king who made Goujian his servant killed himself after an offer of surrender was rejected.
These storytelling tropes form the basis of modern vertical drama storytelling, which heavily draws from the storytelling cultures of Chinese web novels. These novels employ a satisfying narrative loop that is called "Face Slapping." The loop is simple: 1) meek, lowly looking protagonist is mocked by a haughty antagonist. 2) said protagonist does little to dispute the mockery at first, letting the antagonist hang himself through his own hubris, 3) bam - the protagonist is actually the most powerful person in the room and punishes the antagonist for their actions.
This loop is formulaic to a fault, but it is incredibly satisfying, and the vertical drama industry has found a way to industrialize storytelling at a massive scale. Literally thousands of these dramas are built on these tropes: in My Repairman Dad is the Mecha God, a hapless mechanic/mecha factory owner is unaware his dad is the legendary mecha pilot Max. In Abandoned Pawn, Unrivaled Dragon King, the discarded royal son thought to have no powers turns out to be the greatest Dragon master around. Across genres, whether it be fantasy, mecha, real life drama or even omegaverse stuff, all of these dramas follow the same formula. There are sometimes slight variations to the stories told, but as you watch more of these stories, the more you get used to their storytelling conventions to the point where you can tell how a story's going to end. And even then, you look forward to the cathartic reveal of the CEO/Mafia Boss/Dragon King/Lycan Queen. Even if the stories themselves have lost their intrinsic value as distinct narratives, it is akin to fast food, slop in a very obvious sense.
As I watched the protagonists of Rise of the Mech Queen overcome her deeply sexist mech piloting culture to reveal herself as the most powerful and skilled mech pilot on the planet, I wondered why these stories are so engrossing, and I asked myself, what value do they have despite their lack of substance?
IV. a thousand unnoticed openings
During a mediacon for the film Plump Blossom on July 17, 2026, director Rossana Hwang talked about the use of AI in her new film. She is quoted by PEP as saying: “So I don’t see anything wrong with using A.I. because it is just a tool. The main point is still made by human. We still do the storytelling. We still do the music and everything else. The emotions are all by human, storytelling and all…"
Now halfway into Plump Blossom, I know that she is telling the truth. The only problem is everything that is human-made isn't very good either.
Right off the bat the film's music is canned, as if it were playing from a cellphone somewhere in the theater. Meanwhile, all the other sound effects — footsteps, doors opening, what have you — are all crystal clear. It's as if the AI rendered video and the actual, human made musical tracks weren't mixed properly. This film is a musical, and all the songs sound like they were being played on a Bluetooth speaker in the front row.
![]() |
| did you read the above caption in your mind? |
The film is also rendered in a low resolution, 720p at best, and has double image artifacts characteristic of AI generated video. High resolution AI video is time consuming and expensive to render, so the self-admittedly budget-strapped production outfit probably didn't have enough credits or time to make the movie somewhat palatable. I also wonder what video generation model they used for this film. Was it Hailuo? Kling? Wan? Seedance? Grok?
The producers also claim in the credits that they have 3D 'sculptors' and character designers. As we do not know their exact workflow for making these videos in the first place, I don't know to what extent was the AI "assistance" in this film. Did they make their own original 3D models that they fed into a machine, or did they also generate the 3D models via AI?
Films (at least, truly human made ones) possess a language that every viewer unconsciously understands. In my many hours coming across AI content through vertical dramas and films like Plump Blossom, the 'language' of these films seem slightly off, as if it were spoken by a person who only learned that language through imitation. In a normal shot-reverse shot sequence, the characters are shot at angles with their eyelines lining up, so that we can discern, through edits, that they are talking to each other. In Plump Blossom, eyelines are all over the place. Most of the time, the characters of Plump Blossom stare blankly and directly at the screen, as if it were a freakish episode of Dora the Explorer where you are asked no questions and everyone talks at you, but not to you, if that makes any sense. There is no expression in their eyes, only the blank gaze of the abyss. This is basic filmmaking, but as AI doesn't know how films work, it can only approximate based on its training data.
The child seated in my row has gone to the comfort room. It is his second time, and it will not be his last. The film, human element or not, seems to be boring him to death.
V. To write a book is for all the world like humming a song
In 1972, the Italian singer Adriano Celentano released the song Prisencolinensinainciusol. It is an utter gibberish song that mimics the cadence and flow of American speech, and represents what English sounds like to non-English speakers.
In 2021, I wrote a book called In Between Spaces. It is not a very good book. It meanders, it follows too many plot threads, and I could not figure out how to tie up loose ends. It strains believability thanks to a ludicrous plot. This was all after I spent the better part of the year trying to revise it. I am not satisfied with the final result, and critically, I would not consider it favorably. But it was something made up of pent up feelings I wanted to put out into the world, and the lessons I learned from writing that book helped me become a better writer. It is also, top to bottom, something I made by myself.
Five years later, goblin shaped human (or human shaped goblin?) Elon Musk invited me for a free trial of his AI model Grok. Of course the man did not personally do so, but it's fun to imagine the offer coming directly from him, like a troll under a bridge asking for a tax. Curious, I decided to look into what it could do and how it operates.
Using an AI video generator is like wrangling a horse. You have to provide specific instructions in order to make it do what you want, but even then the generation model may hallucinate something by itself. An embrace between two lovers sometimes spawns additional hands that join in. Tables and chairs disappear to enable some characters to move. A person knocked back by a punch rotates in mid air, along the axis of the neck, to land prone on the ground. A man walking away from an explosion does a little ballet twirl.
My experience with Grok made me acutely aware when a certain clip is wholly AI generated. In Plump Blossom, a container of flour falls on our protagonist Ruo Hua's head. Instead of a cute little flourish, and perhaps due to a lack of instruction, the AI improvises. The plump Ruo Hua loses 20 pounds in an instant. The flour covering her face disappears. She throws up the flour with her hands which forms a little cloud, completely ignoring the fact that she was spying on someone and trying to hide in the scene immediately before this one. The backgrounds also don't match up, and the blocking of the characters varies from scene to scene. AI speaks a filmic language that has the right words, but the syntax is utter nonsense, a reverse filmic Prisencolinensinainciusol.
Prisencolinensinainciusol In de col men seivuan Prisencolinensinainciusol ol rait Uis de seim cius nau op de seim Ol uait men in de colobos dai Trrr - ciak is e maind beghin de col Bebi stei ye push yo oh Uis de seim cius nau op de seim Ol uait men in de colobos dai Not s de seim laikiu de promisdin Iu nau in trabol lovgiai ciu gen In do camo not cius no bai for lov so Op op giast cam lau ue cam lov ai Oping tu stei laik cius go mo men Iu bicos tue men cold dobrei goris Oh sandei Ai ai smai sesler Eni els so co uil piso ai In de col men seivuan Prisencolinensinainciusol ol rait Ai ai smai senflecs Eni go for doing peso ai Prisencolinensinainciusol ol rait Uel ai sint no ai giv de sint Laik de cius nobodi oh gud taim lev feis go Uis de seim et seim cius go no ben Let de cius end kai for not de gai giast stei Ai ai smai senflecs Eni go for doing peso aiIn de col mein seivuan Prisencolinensinainciusol ol rait Lu nei si not sicidor Ah es la bebi la dai big iour Ai aismai senflecs Eni go for doing peso ai In de col mein seivuan Prisencolinensinainciusol ol rait Lu nei si not sicodor Ah es la bebi la dai big iour
With basic film knowledge (which these people should have, as they've made films before), enough direction and detailed (often exhaustive) prompting, even AI generated videos can overcome these technical limitations, but the people who "animated" this film didn't try hard enough.
I stopped Grok after that trial period. I read too many horror stories about its use: spurned exes generating videos of their former partners telling them that they love them, people generating porn of their coworkers without their consent, people randomly turning pictures of random people on twitter - even minors - into bikini photos. That last one put Musk and his company in hot water and they aggressively placed controls on the model. They also eventually placed restrictions to how many videos can be generated in a day, effectively crippling the service for anyone who isn't paying thousands of dollars a month. That hasn't stopped a dedicated group of people from testing the limits of the model and creating Grok-generated porn to this day.
On the last day of my free trial, I considered rendering one of the scenes from my book In Between Spaces as an AI video. After trying a few sample images, I ultimately decided against it. However hard I tried, it didn't look like the image in my head.
VI. Uncle Toby
A shot in Plump Blossom shows Princess Ruo Hua eating Bao from a banquet. Her chopsticks seem to pass through the Bao as she takes a bite. The bite does not match the marks left on the food. As the shot pulls back, the other dishes in front of her distort and stutter. They are protean, as if the matter itself cannot agree on what shape it should take.
Ruo Hua's father is the Emperor of the kingdom. In his introductory scene, he is not depicted in the usual Pixar-esque style that the rest of the characters are rendered. Instead, he is rendered realistically which looks very weird considering everyone else looks like a cartoon.
There's another musical scene where the Ruo Hua and her lover General Jian are singing. They are illuminated by candlelight, but their shadows do not match their bodies' movements.
A carrier pigeon flies in the sky. When he takes off, there is no sense of speed, and it looks like he is floating in place before he flies away. The note attached to his feet oscillates between being tied to his right leg, then to his left, then the note is suddenly clutched by his right claw.
There is a sloppiness to this film that evokes the other meaning of the word slop - that is, without care, messy, and of low quality.
Uncle Toby, a character in Lawrence Sterne's 18th Century postmodern novel The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman, was unceremoniously shot in the groin during the Nine Years' War. it is uncertain if the injury has rendered him impotent. With his memory fuzzy and perhaps suffering from postwar trauma, Toby spends his time and money painstakingly recreating military sieges in his yard, an endeavor that, while it does bankrupt him, fulfills him emotionally. His recreations are crafted to the last detail. It is, in his own words, a source of "infinite delight."
VII. Doctor Slop
VIII. Endless is the search of truth
When it first came out in 2023, "the Will Smith eating spaghetti" test video was widely derided for its inaccurate and disturbing looking imagery. Just three years later, multiple AI Video generation models can pass the test with flying colors. Will Smith does indeed look like he's eating spaghetti now.
Perhaps you've read this... whatever this is and concluded that Plump Blossom is bad because the AI animation makes it look bad and soulless and the human made stuff is mediocre at best. That's true, but that's not the reason why I don't l like Plump Blossom and generative AI video generation in general. There are three reasons why and I will explain them all here.
During that same media conference, Rossana Hwang said that "A.I. is bad if you use it to cheat. If you cheated. But if it is a tool to make you attain your objective faster and more efficiently, then it is wise." For her and her team, using AI Animation is a way for people like her, without the expensive and expansive machinery of large corporations, to be able to make an animated feature. Without the resources necessary to make a CGI film normally and without the aid of AI, they would never have made the film I just watched. On the surface, this looks like a valid point.
To be fair, there are many non-generative AI methods that help in animation and filmmaking: in-betweening, rotoscoping, color grading, and so on. But because of the vagueness of the term "AI-Assisted," without a detailed workflow, we can't tell for sure what kind of dark magic Hwang and her team performed with this film.
VIII.I. his anger, at the worst
The Heiress Who Won With Brains is a hugely popular vertical drama in the Philippines. It was so popular, its star Zhang Yinfei, who played protagonist Linda Walker, held a fanmeet here in Manila. From its humble beginnings as an alternative form of media, vertical dramas have become a multibillion dollar industry...
...is what I'm supposed to say, but the rise of AI has all but caused the live action vertical drama industry to implode in a spectacular fashion. AI processes are simply cheaper and it produces more films in the same amount of time with less resources. Nowadays, a large majority of vertical drama productions in China are made by AI. Actors and other film workers have gone on to take other jobs in order to survive. The AI pipeline is so streamlined that storylines, characters and scripts are all made by AI. It's particularly noticeable in character names: a lot of the character names of the vertical dramas I've watched are some variation of Kael, Kale, or Cael (or Elara if she's a woman). I've even seen a character named Kael Kaelen for crying out loud. It's a curious quirk of large language models that pick only from a narrow set of character names when they create a concept. The production pipeline has no need for writers, even for prompts: proprietary software nowadays is so sophisticated it writes its own prompts.
Many jobs have been lost to this surge and the industry has all but collapsed, though some production outfits are still holding on.
Are any of these AI Vertical Dramas any good? No, in fact they share many of the problems of Plump Blossom, even though their advanced generation models smooth out some of the roughness seen in Hwang's film. They make up for that by being maximalist as all hell. Big emotions, a climax every episode, cliffhangers for days, every cut expedient, every indignant line shouted out like the characters' pants were on fire. If they employ a form that blunts emotion and 'humanity', AI makes up for it by exaggeration.
VIII.II. cheer up my lads, I'll shew you land
In Capas, Tarlac, a collective of farmers and Aetas are signing a petition against Pax Silica. The complex, which includes both data centers and manufacturing facilities, threatens their homes and livelihood. Data centers need fresh water, and so do farmers; inquiries as to where the Pax Silica people will source their water has been met with vague non-answers.
There is no secret CEO or Mafia Boss that will help the people of Capas with their struggle. No faces of arrogant CEOs will be slapped. No lowly janitor will step up to be the hidden mecha king and stomp these data centers to the ground. The people of Capas, and the people of many other towns like it, fight to the rights to their land, even as we create another video where Optimus Prime and Twilight Sparkle French kiss in the Louvre.
The obvious solution to this is to **** *** **** ** ***** ********, **** ***** **** ********* ******** ** **** ** ****, ***** ***** ***** ** ***** ***** **** *** *********** **** ****** ****. There is no cosmic justice other than what we wreak with our own bloody hands.
VIII.III. ...writing, when properly managed
The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman, is a book about a man who cannot, for the life of him, tell his life story. There are too many digressions, too many stories of other things, before he can get back to his main objective. It takes him three chapters to even describe his birth. A character will be alluded to in one chapter, then will vanish from the plot until many chapters later. It is a wonderful, meandering, rambling mess. Its text is well known for its usage of em dashes, especially to denote broken trains of thought. A postmodern novel that existed before postmodernism, it is one of the most curious pieces of literature penned by a human mind.
All around the world, bookstores are getting orders for all sorts of books by the ton. These books—textbooks, marginalia, historical or rare first- or only- editions, books like The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman—are taken to a facility, their spines cut, their words digitized and their corpses thrown away. Training LLMs needs fresh data, and AI-generated data or slop pervades the internet now. The monster needs fresh blood.
Sometimes, while watching one of these vertical dramas, I'll catch a glimpse of something that used to be a human idea. An alien in an intergalactic arena is a dead ringer for Saru from Star Trek Discovery. The mech suits from Mecha Queen are a mishmashed hybrid of Iron Man's suit and Gypsy Danger from Pacific Rim. The hunky, muscular protagonist (who is almost always named Kael) looks like Henry Cavill.
The point for me has never been that it looks bad. Plump Blossom looks bad, yes, but it's not the reason why I dislike it. There's no way of pussyfooting around it: Generative AI lies on a foundation of theft and exploitation. It cannot create anything new - it can only steal and appropriate, approximating whatever's been fed to it. If it really is a tool, would you feel at ease knowing that using this tool directly (and negatively) impacts the lives of others? Are your dreams, your story, worth their weight in the blood of others?
IX. Aposiopesis
This is not a review of Plump Blossom. Or rather, it is me trying (and maybe failing) to review Plump Blossom, doomed to be caught up in too many digressions till the end of time. But there is one last question I will try to answer: what is my biggest fear regarding AI productions?
Food Never Comes is a Korean site where people can pretend to shop online for imaginary items, then track their "purchase" as it makes its way to them. The item is immaterial; all it sells is a feeling, an experience.
AI, in many ways, is like that. It is the perfect distillation of art as a commodity—art that is not read or analyzed, but consumed. The maximalist nature of vertical dramas is well served by AI, because it is a dopamine delivery system that injects catharsis straight into your brain. The higher the stakes, the more arrogant the antagonist, the more oblivious anyone else is to the secret CEO's identity, the greater the payoff, the more satisfying the conclusion.
And, quite deviously, the use of AI also commoditizes the act of creation itself. You can pretend, through credits and subscriptions and investments in RAM and hardware, that you have created something, even if what lies before you was made by a theft machine powered by the blood of others.
We are slowly losing the ability to read films and books and media. All we see are archetypes and tropes and make value judgements on that. In the future, will 'art' no longer exist in the form we have now? In the future, will it all be distilled into commoditized emotions?
The Ugly Sister is the Chaos Queen is a tale about Aurora, an ostensibly ugly member of a noble family. She is not actually ugly as the AI has trouble rendering ugliness, but every character in this story definitely thinks she is. She eventually gains the ability to tap into her once-sealed chaos powers and regains the respect of the kingdom that shunned her. But before she does so, she is infested with abyssal energy and turned into an entity that threatens to destroy the entire kingdom. Aurora remembers many small little moments of kindness that manages to pull her back from the brink, saving her soul from corruption.
It was then when I felt it: a little tinge of emotion. Even knowing its many deficiencies in form, this work of bastardized 'art' made me feel something. An artificial production like this does not need to be perfect in order to evoke emotion; it only needs to be good enough. If it becomes indistinguishable from the real thing, when the theft becomes so convincing that it fools the human mind, what then?
How exactly do you fight something like this? I don't know. Many local filmmakers are beginning to accept AI. People have already started talks advocating for its existence. This last part is an aposiopesis, a sentence deliberately left unfinished. What we do from now on may well decide the future of all artistic works.
In the meantime, all I have is my trusty old tablet and my art. Here's something I drew back in 2021, 12 years after I first tried out digital art, when I still had time to draw. It's still pretty crude, but I'd like to believe I've improved somehow.


























